Sunday, October 31, 2010

Halloween, impersonations, and Moscow pic



Happy Halloween. We are having a party at our house with Elizabeth and her friends and Stephen and his friends. We have about 12 or 15 carved pumpkins, chicken soup with rice, sugar cookies, and lots of cool costumes--with people inside. I will send some pics of the party another day. Mary is off to her Final's Club event tonight. She had her Halloween party on Friday night--and she and Jonathan dressed as Wally and Wendy Waldo--from Where's Waldo. Maybe I'll send some pics of that as well--apparently they were quite a hit. Elizabeth has a fabulous costume--she is an elven vampire princess. It suits her perfectly on many levels! Aaron is a wolfman.

Sorry, but I also have to post John Stewart's two impersonations of Glenn Beck--just for posterity. Nov 6, 2009 impersonation and the March, 2010 impersonation. They are amazingly funny, if you're in to that sort of thing. I tried to get the 2010 without the intro, but could not find it. Oh well. Happy Halloween.

PS: I included that gorgeous pic of Moscow because Rand was just there, if I remember correctly.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

No need for an ipod; memorize poetry!



A neighbor boy, a friend of my kids, went on to the University of Tennessee and writes a column--I think weekly--for The Beacon, student newspaper. I never see the Beacon anymore, since I long ago quit teaching at UT. But Russ brought home a paper from school with an article about the new UT president, and I just happened to see this piece by Amien. I thought it was marvelous!

Poetry overlooked as form of entertainment

Notes on Art & Literature by Amien Essif

This summer I was designated as the official lawnmower of my parents’ yard. After the novelty wore off and I grew bored, it occurred to me that I could listen to my iPod while I mowed. But my second epiphany was that I didn’t have an iPod. This is no accident either. It has always been my philosophy that when I’m outside, I don’t want to be looking at a screen or plugging my ears, even with good music.


But I thought of another option, one that seemed out of place for someone of my generation, and thus all the more exciting: I would memorize poetry.


In fact, I had already been carrying Tennyson’s “Ulysses” in my wallet for some time now, but I rarely took the time to re-read it. The pleasure I got from keeping the poem in my wallet was more like the pleasure one gets from having a tattoo on one’s butt cheek: you never see it, but you sometimes get the chills when you realize you’re sitting on something special.


Anyway, before attacking the lawn in the blazing heat of Knoxville’s worst summer on record, I read over “Ulysses” a few times and tried to get the first couple of verses into my head.


Then, as I mowed, I started from the beginning: “It little profits that an idle king, by this still hearth, among these barren crags . . . “ And if I forgot a word or a line, I would just skip to the next one I knew. “I cannot rest from travel; I will drink life to the lees . . . “ These lines gave me chills as I mauled down pine cones and maple twigs, no less so as I write them now.


By July, I had the poem memorized, and I would recite it every now and then to myself or to a friend if the situation evoked it. It seemed like a cool trick, and I felt like I had done something useful and permanent for myself.


But the real beauty of it didn’t hit me until later when I was sitting on a bench in Chicago, people watching along the lakefront. If I had had an iPod then, I would have been listening to music. But I didn’t, so I started reciting “Ulysses” in a silent voice—a recitation coming from within.


Jim Holt, in an essay for the New York Times, writes, “Mere memorization (of poetry) gives way to performance . . . It’s a physical feeling, and it’s a deeply pleasurable one. You can get something like it by reading the poem out loud off the page, but the sensation is far more powerful when the words come from within.”


I’ll admit here that while I have “Ulysses” memorized, word for archaic word, I don’t know what much of it means. But as I said one of these mysterious lines to myself—


Life piled on life

Were all too little, and of one to me

Little remains. . .


The meaning hit me like a shiver of air or a first swig of wine. Ulysses is dying I thought. Life piled on life is not enough to satisfy him, yet he only has a little of his one life left to him.


I let the tragedy of this hit me in the poetic way, where you don’t feel the pain of it, only the beauty. And I wondered what it would be like if I had a hundred poems or a thousand poems memorized.


As an English major, I’ve read or skimmed my fair share of the Great Classics, but for half of them, I couldn’t recount the plot, much less revisit individual lines and turned phrases. It’s a shame that I don’t carry these words around with me, and I’m always reminded of Bradbury’s “Fahrenheit 451” in which the survivors of a cultural holocaust recall all the words to all the books they had ever read in order to recreate human cultural history.


Fifty years ago—and most parents and grandparents will attest to this—students were taught poetry through memorization. I don’t resent the current emphasis on critical thinking, of course, but it is sad that we’ve more or less dropped our cultural inheritance on the road to some new ideal student: the student with access to so much information that he or she has no time for any individual piece of art. Poetry now is seen as “easy” literature because it is short and usually available on the Internet for free.


But poems as individual creations have become decorations rather than culminations of experience.


So, memorize a poem. Find a favorite something that made you shiver when you first read it, and put it in your head. It is nothing short of discovering a new way to appreciate art.


And you won’t need an iPod.



Friday, October 22, 2010

Why must the rich pay more? (And Mankiw)


Here is Stephen Colbert's jibe at Harvard's Greg Mankiw--posted by Mankiw on his own blog. Check it out.

Mankiw was one of the superstar profs I got to hear when I went to Harvard for Freshman parents' weekend last year. The clip is pretty hilarious. Personally I thought Mankiw was very impressive, especially when he explained how he tried to convince then President Bush (Mankiw was an economic advisor to the Bush administration) to pass a ~$2.00 gas tax to pay for some of the real costs of gas and oil--only a very tiny amount of that $2.00 going to global warming issues.

In addition to Colbert's take on Mankiw working less, I also didn't feel too desperately sorry for his kids who will inherit less because of the tax on the rich--probably they'll only get a million or so each. Life's tough. (If you want to read Mankiw's actual New York Times piece, here it is.)

Why you might ask must the rich pay more? Isn't that unfair? Why can't the rich decide what to do or who to help with their own money? Sorry, I don't feel your pain. This country gave the rich the opportunity to make it big. Many made it big honestly, many didn't. Most could never have managed it without the U.S. Constitution, government, protection, laws, etc. etc. The government has an obligation to keep churning people up into the middle class, and not leave them languishing in generational poverty--which is not only unchristian, but is a financial drain on everyone. It would be nice if we could depend on people's Christian ethic, but few Christians actually follow Christ in His mission and zeal for the poor and despised of the world. And if we can't help struggling people for Christ's sake, it might be good to remember that the downtrodden have various ways of taking revenge, and so help them for our own sake.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

I am not a witch


Just in case you missed the Christine O'Donnell ad declaring that she is not a witch, you can see it here. And if you missed the SNL spoof of the ad, you can see it right here as well. Charming to say the least.